Regulations
•UK legislation: The UK Statute Law Database
•EU legislation: EUR-Lex
http://www.marinemanagement.org.uk/fisheries/monitoring/regulations.htm
KEIFCA Compliance and Enforcement Strategy
Our approach to prosecutions is in line with the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs' Enforcement Policy Statement, the Code for Crown Prosecutors and the Marine Management Organistaions' Compliance and Enforcement Strategy.
We published our KEIFCA Compliance and Enforcement Strategy in January 2012. For further information please contact us at
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

The byelaws relating to area A
The byelaws relating to area B
The byelaws relating to area C
The byelaws relating to area D
Emergency Byelaw Procedure
Background Defra guidance
The Marine and Coastal Access Act 2009 requires an IFCA to notify the Secretary of State directly within 24 hours of making the emergency byelaw. The IFCA should also send a copy of that byelaw to the MMO. Prior to making the emergency byelaw, the IFCA should have sufficient evidence to assess the need for these measures, however the precautionary principle can be applied where appropriate. Relevant stakeholders will also have been informally consulted, as necessary. This evidence will form part of the initial Impact Assessment. Once the emergency byelaw has been made, the IFCA should advertise the emergency byelaw to ensure that anybody affected by the emergency byelaw has the opportunity to comply. If stakeholders wish to comment on an Emergency byelaw they should inform the IFCA and the MMO, who will consider their concerns.
The IFCA should continually review whether the emergency byelaw should remain in place. This should include a full IA and consultation to review whether the emergency byelaw should be replaced with a permanent byelaw. Should the IFCA wish to extend the period during which the emergency byelaw remains in force, it should submit the case for extending it to the MMO, explaining why the extension is needed and providing evidence of activity by the IFCA to put a permanent byelaw in place.
The IFCA should submit the request for the extension to the MMO at least 8 weeks before the expiry of the 12 month period of the initial emergency byelaw. This is to allow sufficient time for the request to be reviewed for suitability for signing by the Secretary of State. If the MMO is satisfied that the extension can be justified, they will make recommendations to the Secretary of State to grant the extension.
K&EIFCA will give consideration to introducing an Emergency Byelaw by the following procedure:
Consideration will be triggered either by information gathered by K&EIFCA officers or reports from stakeholders. Stakeholders and K&EIFCA officers would be asked to fill in a form covering the following topics:
- Background on who they are and their organisation/ mandate
- Describes the current activity and gives an indication of level of activity (current and perceived ongoing)
- Describes the impact of that activity in relation to the sustainable exploitation of marine species and/or impact on MPA feature?
- Explanation of why the need to make the byelaw could not reasonably have been foreseen.
- Give a brief review of any efforts made to deal with the issue in a non-legislative way.
- Suggestion on the possible wording of an emergency byelaw.
After the appropriate form had been submitted, the Chief Officer will consult the Chairman and Vice Chairman and discuss the merits of the application based on the defra emergency byelaw guidance. The decision will then be made to continue with the process and gather information for an initial impact assessment or to write back to the stakeholder involved and explain why no further action will be taken. Legal advice might be taken at this point.
K&EIFCA Officers will gather information regarding the issue in question and complete an initial impact assessment. An initial impact assessment would aim review the following issues, depending on time available:
- Summary of why this new activity is taking place and what is motivating parties to undertake the new activity. Explanation of why the need to make the byelaw could not reasonably have been foreseen.
- Summarise any current legal powers relating to this activity.
- Where possible K&EIFCA officers would gather and record first hand data about activity levels (e.g number of people/ boats/ amount of gear involved).Records would also be made of stakeholder’s estimates of activity.
- Where possible information would be gathered by K&EIFCA officers aimed at quantifying the amount of damage/impact taking place by the activity.
- A comparison would be made of current activity and impacts with previous activity/impacts.
- Estimate of future impact on species or feature if action is not taken (if activity continues at current level).
- Give a brief review of any efforts made to deal with the issue in a non-legislative way.
- Suggestion on the possible wording of an emergency byelaw.
- Estimated cost on sectors undertaking activity if activity is stopped using the suggested byelaw wording.
- Estimated cost of enforcement of emergency byelaw using the suggested byelaw wording.
- If time allowed brief comments on the activity would then be sort from other relevant bodies and stakeholders (e.g. MMO, NE, CEFAS, and epresentatives of sectors affected, local councils and possibly the EA).
On completion of the impact assessment the Chief Officer will consult the Chairman and Vice Chairman and might seek legal advice.
This will result in one of the following:
- Proceeding with an Emergency Byelaw. If an Emergency Byelaw is implemented immediately, the action will be reported to the next K&EIFCA meeting for ratification.
- Call a special meeting of the Technical Panel or a full K&EIFCA meeting.
- Take no immediate action but report to the next scheduled K&EIFCA meeting (writing back to the organisation or individual initially requesting the emergency byelaw with an explanation why this has not been taken forward).
If actions 1 or 2 are undertaken the Chief Officer will consult the Chairman and Vice Chairman in drawing up the initial wording of the emergency byelaw.
Once agreement had been reached to proceed with an emergency byelaw and the wording of the byelaw had been finalised, the timings and actions written in the Marine and Coastal Access Act 2009 would be followed. This will be accompanied by on-going monitoring and reporting as referred to in the previous sections.
Limits of the District
Kent & Essex IFCA district covers an area of over 3,412 km2, and extends from the east end of Rye Bay in Kent to the northern boundary of Essex on the River Stour. The seaward boundary follows the to the 6 mile nautical limit measured from the 1983 baseline, which, due to drying sand banks, extends up to 15 miles offshore in some places. The up-river K&EIFCA boundary in the Thames the includes the waters adjacent to Kent County Council and Thurrock Council, with the district boundary running from Dartford creek (River Darent) on the south shore to Mar Dyke on the North Shore. The other district limits for the rest of the rivers located within the boundaries of Kent and Essex extended to their tidal limit (including, the Medway, the Blackwater and the Colne).
To see a chart of each of the ten IFCAs, please click here.
The Kent & Essex Inshore Fisheries and Conservation District is defined in the The Kent and Essex Inshore Fisheries and Conservation Order 2010 (Statutory Instruments 2010 No. 2190) available online at http://www.legislation.gov.uk
For detailed charts of our district please click on the links below
• Approaches to Thames Estuary (PDF, 15.7 MB)
• Newhaven to Dover (PDF, 15.7 MB)
Please note these charts are not for navigation
Minimum legal sizes
ALL FISH BELOW THESE SIZES MUST BE RETURNED IMMEDIATELY TO THE SEA
Council Regulation (EEC) 850/98, Statutory Instruments
* Kent and Essex Sea Fisheries Committee Byelaws
Click here for a guide to where the measurement is taken. Unless specified all measurements apply to the dimension of length. Additional information regarding the method of measurement for fish, crustacea and molluscs should be referred to if necessary.
| Finfish |
|
| BASS | 36 cm |
| COD | 35 cm |
| HADDOCK | 30 cm |
| HERRING | 20 cm |
| HORSE MACKEREL | 15 cm |
| MACKEREL (North Sea) | 30 cm |
| MACKEREL (Other Areas) | 20 cm |
| SOLE | 24 cm |
| PLAICE | 27 cm |
| WHITING | 27 cm |
| GREY MULLET* | 30 cm |
| SKATES & RAYS (Wing tip to wing tip) | 40 cm |
| SKATES & RAYS (Detached wings) | 19 cm |
| Crustacea | ||
| LOBSTER (Homarus gammarus) | 87 mm | carapace length |
| EDIBLE CRAB (Cancer pagurus) | 130 mm | carapace width |
| VELVET CRAB (Necora puber) | 65 mm | carapace width |
| SPIDER CRAB (Maia squinado) |
130 mm (males) 120 mm (females) |
carapace length carapace length |
| CRAWFISH (Palinurus spp.) | 95 mm | carapace length |
| Molluscs | ||
| QUEEN SCALLOP (Chlamys spp) | 40 mm | shell width |
| KING SCALLOP (Pecten maximus) (Area VIId) | 110 mm | shell width |
| KING SCALLOP (Pecten maximus)* | 110 mm | shell width |
| WHELK (Buccinum undatum) | 45 mm | shell length |
| RAZOR CLAM (Ensis spp) | 10 cm | shell length |
| OYSTER (native) (Ostrea edulis)* | 7 cm | ring size (see below) |
| COCKLE (Cerastoderma edule) | 16 mm | shell width |
The shell must be unable to pass through a circular ring with a 70 mm internal diameter
Minimum sizes for less common species are as follows (cm):-
Anchovy 12, Bluefin Tuna 6.4kg, Blue Ling 70, Hake 27, Ling 63, Megrim 20, Octopus 0.75kg, Pollack 30, Saith 35, Sardine 11, Swordfish 25kg/125cm, Clam 4, Donax Clams 2.5, Hard Clam 5, Short necked Clam 4, Surf Clam 2.5, Carpetshell 4, Grooved Carpetshell 4, Norway Lobster 8.5/2.5/4.6, Crawfish 11
Undersized marine organisms shall not be retained on board or be transhipped, landed, transported, stored, sold, displayed or offered for sale, but shall be returned immediately into the sea.
